GLEANINGS FROM NEW CHURCH HISTORY ROBERT HINDMARSH 1929
[Frontispiece: Photograph of the Angel Hotel - a Colchester Landmark. Here Robert Hindmarsh delivered a lecture in July, 1816.]
NEW CHURCH LIFE
VOL. XLIX JANUARY, 1929 No. 1
ACCOUNT OF A LECTURE AT COLCHESTER IN 1816.
FROM "RISE AND PROGRESS OF THE NEW JERUSALEM CHURCH," PP. 258, 259.
As the rise of a Society of the New Church in the neighborhood of Colchester had attracted some notice in that large and respectable town, and had even called forth there a professed opponent of the doctrines, in the person of a Methodist Preacher, who had endeavored to vilify the character of Swedenborg, and make his sentiments appear ridiculous, in a small pamphlet which had been extensively circulated; it was thought that it might be useful in checking this opposition, and in improving the attention thereby excited into a serious and profitable inquiry into the real merits of the case, if convenience could be obtained for Mr. Hindmarsh to deliver a Lecture or two in that town. Two friends, therefore, went over from Brightlingsea to make inquiries, who, not being able to find any other suitable place, applied to the Mayor for the use of the Town Hall, stating the object to be the delivery of a Theological Lecture; and the Mayor, without hesitation, immediately granted the request. Posting and hand-bills were accordingly circulated through the town, apprizing the inhabitants "that on Friday, the 26th of July, by permission of the worshipful the Mayor, a Lecture would be delivered in the Town Hall by Mr. Hindmarsh, from Manchester, on some of the most important doctrines of the New Church, called the New Jerusalem, particularly the doctrine of the Divine Trinity, the doctrine of life, or the way to heaven, and the state of man after the death, of the body."
Hereupon, as was afterwards learnt, the Corporation and the Clergy of the town took the alarm, and insisted upon the Mayor's revoking his consent; which was notified to the inhabitants by counter-proclamations, and the assiduous vociferations of the Town Crier. In the meantime, Mr. Hindmarsh, with some friends from London and Manchester, had arrived, but remained without any knowledge of the change till about three o'clock on the day appointed. On the spur of this emergency a large room was engaged at the Angel inn, a few paces from the Town Hall, and proper measures were taken to announce the change in the place of delivering the Lecture. Notwithstanding the shortness of the notice, the room was crowded almost to suffocation by seven o'clock, the time of commencement, and many went away unable to obtain admission. The number in the room was supposed to be not less than from four to five hundred.
Previous to the commencement of the Lecture, and after the people were assembled, the landlord informed Mr. Hindmarsh that he had been threatened with a fine of forty pounds if he permitted the Lecture to be delivered in his house, and he desired to know if anything of a political nature was intended to be introduced. Mr. Hindmarsh assured him that his subjects would be purely theological, that he was in no danger of any unpleasant results from the meeting, and that he should stand completely indemnified for anything he might suffer on account of it. The landlord, being satisfied with this assurance, told him he might begin as soon as he pleased.
The Lecture is stated by some who were present to have been of the most clear and convincing description, and it appeared to give much satisfaction to the greater part of the audience. Some few, indeed, near the door, among whom were noticed two or three Methodist Preachers, were heard at times to mutter disapprobation, saying of the Lecturer, "Why, he denies the doctrine of a Trinity of Divine Persons! He sets aside the atonement, the merits of Christ, justification by faith alone, and the resurrection of the material body!" Finding, however, that the company in general was too much engaged in listening to the doctrines of the New Church on these subjects to suffer their attention to be withdrawn for a moment from them, they at length discontinued their opposition, and remained silent.
3
When the Lecture, which lasted an hour and a quarter, was concluded, one of the Methodist Preachers present asked leave to propose some questions; which being granted, he abused the permission by haranguing those who chose to listen to him, without giving Mr. Hindmarsh sufficient opportunity to reply; who, therefore, seeing a disorderly spirit beginning to manifest itself, and judging that no real good could be done by controversy, prudently put an end to the meeting, earnestly recommending to the company to reflect seriously and without prejudice on the important subjects which had been laid before them that evening.