Zacchaeus Rises Above the Crowd

1. And [He] entered and passed through Jericho.

2. And behold, [there was] a man called by the name Zacchaeus; and he was the chief publican, and he was rich.

3. And he was seeking to see Jesus, who He is, and could not for the crowd, because he was little of stature.

4. And he ran before and went up into a mulberry fig tree to see Him, for He was about to pass that [way].

5. And when Jesus came upon the place, looking up He saw him, and said to him, Zacchaeus, make haste, step down, for today I must stay at thy house.

6. And making haste, he stepped down, and received Him rejoicing.

7. And seeing, they all murmured, saying that He had come in to repose with a man [that is] a sinner.

8. And Zacchaeus stood, and said to the Lord, Behold, Lord, the half of my belongings I give to the poor, and if I have anything from anyone by extortion, I give back [to him] fourfold.

9. And Jesus said to him, Today salvation has come to pass for this house, because he also is a son of Abraham.

10. For the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost.

Seeing Jesus

In biblical times, tax collectors were seen as despised traitors who turned against their own people by collecting taxes for the oppressive Roman government. Because of this, tax collectors were regarded as persons with whom righteous people should not be associated. In the previous chapter, for example, when the self-righteous Pharisee said his prayers, it was clear that he saw himself as superior to the tax collector, especially when the Pharisee began his prayer by saying, “I thank you that I am not like other men—extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector” (Luke 18:11). However, when the tax collector prayed, he didn’t compare himself to anyone. Instead, his only words were. “God, be merciful to me, a sinner” (Luke 18:13).

The episode about the Pharisee and the tax collector is followed by a story about a rich ruler who went away sorrowful because he refused to part with his riches; then comes a brief episode about a blind beggar whose eyes were opened. As we have seen, these are not random episodes, but rather they are seamlessly connected. This connection becomes even more clear as we turn to the next episode about a “tax collector” who is “rich” and who very much wants to “see” Jesus (Luke 19:2-3).

The tax collector, whose name is Zacchaeus, is standing in a crowd anticipating the arrival of Jesus who is about to pass through Jericho on His way to Jerusalem. In addition to being a tax collector and being rich, Zacchaeus is also described as being “of little stature”—not tall enough to see above the crowd. Knowing that Jesus is about to pass through Jericho, Zacchaeus climbs up into a tree where he will be able to get a better view of Jesus. He wants to “see” Jesus.

“Seeing,” as we have pointed out, relates to the understanding, and especially to the part of the mind that desires to know the truth because it wants to do good. Therefore, it could be said that Zacchaeus not only wants to get a better view of Jesus, but he also he wants to know who Jesus is, not out of mere curiosity, but out of a genuinely good affection. In this regard, Zacchaeus’ effort to “see who Jesus is” represents the God-given desire implanted in each of us to know God and understand His will. ¹

Zacchaeus’ climbing up into a tree is significant. People who have stood in a large crowd while a parade goes by know the feeling of having their view blocked by the people standing in front of them. Like Zacchaeus, who climbed up into a tree to get a clearer view of Jesus, there are times when we want to “see God,” but cannot get a clear view. We feel a need to get up into a place of higher understanding. Spiritually speaking, this is a place where we can rise above the multitude of confusing thoughts and emotions that crowd out the truth and prevent us from seeing how God works in our lives. And so, Zacchaeus, who wants to see Jesus, finds that higher place by climbing up into a tree. As it is written, Zacchaeus ran ahead and “climbed up” into a sycamore tree to see Jesus (Luke 19:4). ²

Becoming a “son of Abraham”

Zacchaeus’ climbing up into a tree represents the way each of us can rise above our old ways of thinking and responding so that we might be ready for a new view of spiritual reality. In this regard, it should be noted that Zacchaeus climbs up into the tree because he is anticipating that Jesus is “about to pass that way” (Luke 19:4). It is this hopeful anticipation that a new insight is about to pass our way that allows a new understanding to come into our minds. This kind of openness, or readiness to receive the truth, is essential. ³

It is at this point, as Jesus is entering Jerusalem, that He looks up into the tree and sees Zacchaeus. Sensing that Zacchaeus is eager to learn more about Him, Jesus tells him to come down from the tree. As it is written, “When Jesus came to the place, He looked up and saw Zacchaeus, and said to him, ‘Zacchaeus, make haste and step down, for today I must stay at your house” (Luke 19:5). Jesus’ staying at Zacchaeus’ “house” is sacred symbolism. It represents divine truth coming into the human mind. Upon Jesus’ command, Zacchaeus immediately comes down from the tree and receives Jesus “joyfully” (Luke 19:6). ⁴

The crowd, however, is less than joyful. In their minds, Zacchaeus is nothing more than a despicable person who overtaxes them, takes his cut, and sends the rest to Rome—the dominant world power at that time. Zacchaeus is hated not only because he is a tax collector, but even more so because he is Jericho’s “chief tax collector” (Luke 19:2). Therefore, the people murmured among themselves, saying that Jesus “has gone to be a guest with a man who is a sinner” (Luke 19:7).

As we soon discover, there is more to Zacchaeus than simply being a tax collector. Although he is very rich, he gives half of his goods to the poor. Furthermore, if he discovers that he has wronged anyone, he is quick to make amends repaying them fourfold what he owes them. He seems to be a good man, a man who receives Jesus joyfully, and of whom Jesus says, “Today salvation has come to this house, because he is also a son of Abraham” (Luke 19:9).

In referring to Zacchaeus as a “son of Abraham,” Jesus is saying that Zacchaeus is very much a member of the community. As a “son of Abraham,” he shares in their rich lineage, regardless of the fact that he is a tax collector. In the Word, a “son of Abraham” is also referred to as the “seed of Abraham.” In the spiritual sense, a “son of Abraham” is anyone who willingly receives the seeds of goodness and truth that flow in from the Lord. This means that all people can receive the kingdom of God. Ancestry does not matter; social class does not matter. It does not matter whether a person descends from peasants or princes, cobblers or kings. Salvation is for everyone who is open and willing to receive it. And whenever people do so, as does Zacchaeus when he joyfully receives Jesus, they are called “sons of Abraham.” ⁵

The story of Zacchaeus, then, is a symbolic way of expressing the deeper truth that salvation comes to us whenever we are willing to joyfully receive the divine truth, taking it into our minds, just as we would welcome a noble guest into our homes. Zacchaeus’ joyful reception of Jesus is another parable containing the deeper message that God comes to each of us as the divine truth, seeking to save us when we have been lost in a crowd of anxious thoughts and false ideas. All of this is contained in the closing words of this episode where, once again, Jesus speaks about the divine truth as the “Son of Man.” As it is written, “The Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost” (Luke 19:10).

The Parable of the Minas

11. But as they heard these things, He added [and] told a parable, for He was nigh to Jerusalem, and they thought that the kingdom of God was going to appear immediately.

12. He said therefore, A certain noble man went into a distant country, to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.

13. And he called his own ten servants, and gave them ten minas, and said to them, Do business till I come.

14. But his citizens hated him, and sent an embassy after him, saying, We are not willing [that] this [man] should reign over us.

15. And it came to pass that when he had come back, having received the kingdom, he also said [that] these servants should be called to him, to whom he had given the silver, that he might know what every one had gained by doing business.

16. And the first came, saying, Lord, thy mina has earned ten minas.

17. And he said to him, Well [done], thou good servant; because thou hast been faithful in the least, have thou authority over ten cities.

18. And the second came, saying, Lord, thy mina has made five minas.

19. And he said to him also, Be thou also over five cities.

20. And another came saying, Lord, behold, thy mina, which I have held laid up in a napkin.

21. For I feared thee, for thou art an austere man; thou takest what thou placest not, and reapest what thou didst not sow.

22. And he says to him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, wicked servant. Thou didst know that I am an austere man, taking what I placed not, and reaping what I did not sow.

23. Why then gavest not thou my silver to the bank, so that I at my coming might have exacted it with interest?

24. And he said to those that stood by, Take from him the mina, and give [it] to him that has ten minas.

25. And they said to him, Lord, he has ten minas.

26. For I say to you that to everyone that has shall be given; but from him that has not, even that which he has shall be taken away from him.

27. Nevertheless, those enemies of mine that were not willing that I should reign over them, bring [them] hither and slay [them] in front of me.

The previous episode focused on Zacchaeus’ joyful reception of Jesus. In this next episode, Jesus shifts the focus, describing the attitude of those who refuse to welcome His coming. More deeply, it is about those who refuse to welcome the arrival of divine truth when it comes into their lives. As is His usual practice, Jesus does this through the use of a parable.

The parable begins with these words: “Now as they heard these things, He spoke another parable, because He was near Jerusalem and because they thought the kingdom of God would appear immediately” (Luke 19:11). This refers to the fact that most people were expecting that Jesus was about to declare Himself to be the new king of Israel upon entering Jerusalem. Indeed, it was expected that Jesus would be proclaimed the royal successor of David. According to this line of thinking, Jesus was the long-awaited Messiah, the “anointed one” who would receive the kingdom, sit on a throne, and be declared their king. They would no longer be under the rule of the Roman government.

Because Jesus knew that they were thinking in this way, and because He wanted to correct their misunderstanding, He told them a parable beginning with these words: “A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom and to return” (Luke 19:12). Jesus then adds that the nobleman’s trip would not be entirely successful. As it is written, “The citizens hated him and sent a delegation saying, ‘We will not have this man reign over us’” (Luke 19:13).

Spiritually speaking, the “citizens who hated Him” are those parts of ourselves that do not want to be ruled by the Lord’s divine truth. We prefer to be self-sufficient, relying on ourselves and our own perceptions rather than on the Lord’s leading. Jesus knows that He is headed for Jerusalem where some people will gladly receive Him as king while others will not want “this man” to rule over them.

In the next verse of the parable, it is written that the nobleman “called ten of his servants, delivered to them ten minas, and said to them, ‘Do business till I come’” (Luke 19:13). Each of the ten servants receives one mina, a silver coin equivalent to about three months of wages for manual labor. The parable goes on to describe how the servants “do business” with their silver coins. One returns to the nobleman ten times what he is given, and is promptly rewarded with ten cities to govern. The second returns to the nobleman five times what he is given, and is promptly rewarded with five cities to govern. But the third simply returns to the nobleman the same amount he is given, saying, “Here is your mina which I have kept hidden in a handkerchief. For I feared you, because you are an austere man. You collect what you do not deposit, and reap what you do not sow” (Luke 19:20-21).

This parable is about how God operates within each of us. He gives to each of us knowledge of His will, represented by the silver minas, and He asks us “do business” with that knowledge. That is, He wants us to make good use of that knowledge by putting it into our life. The more we do so, the more that knowledge increases and eventually becomes wisdom. ⁶

As we continue to apply truth to our lives, we gradually acquire the ability to “rule over” greater portions of our life. This means that we gain an increased understanding of spiritual truth which, in turn, allows us to make finer distinctions and have greater happiness in our lives. In the language of sacred scripture, this is represented as having “authority over ten cities,” which refers to gaining a great deal of understanding, while “authority over five cities” represents gaining some understanding. However, if we do nothing with the truth we are given, we will eventually lose it all. As it is written, “Take the mina from him and give it to him who has ten minas … for I say to you that to everyone who has will be given; and from him who does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him” (Luke 19:24-26). ⁷

“Slay those enemies of mine”

At the end of the episode, when the nobleman receives the message saying, “We will not have this man reign over us,” he says, “Bring here those enemies of mine who did not want me to reign over them, and slay them before me” (Luke 19:27). The truth is that the Lord condemns no one and punishes no one. Therefore, the final words of the nobleman, commanding that his enemies be slain, must have a deeper meaning. Looking back at the lesson of the minas, it is clear that God gives us the knowledge and perception of truth, and also inspires us to live according to it. To that extent the nobleman who gives the silver minas (truths) to his servants represents God in our lives. But it is contrary to reason to imagine that a good God would order people to be slain because they refuse to be governed by Him. This is what an evil tyrant does, not a loving God.

The strong imagery, therefore, is not about what God does to us, but rather it is about what we do to ourselves when we willfully reject God’s reign over us. To have the truth, but not live by it, is destructive. We “slay” something that is precious within us—represented by the loss of the minas.

As a result, our lives become empty and void. Although we still go through the motions of our daily activities, we are spiritually dead. This, then, is the spiritual meaning stored up and contained within the words, “Bring those enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, and slay them before me.” Spiritually seen, this is saying that we should never allow our lower nature to rule over us. Instead, we should “slay” those enemies within us that reject the Lord’s reign so that the parts of ourselves that are receptive to God’s inflowing love and wisdom can grow. ⁸

The Triumphal Entry

28. And when He had said these things, He went before, going up to Jerusalem.

29. And it came to pass, as He was near to Bethphage and Bethany, at the mountain called [the Mount] of Olives, He sent two of His disciples,

30. Saying, Go ye into the village opposite, in which, on going in, you shall find a colt tied on which no man ever sat; loose him, [and] bring [him].

31. And if anyone ask you, Why do you loose [him]? thus you shall say to him, Because the Lord has need of him.

32. And they that were sent went, and found [it] even as He had said to them.

33. But as they were loosing the colt, his owners said to them, Why do you loosen the colt?

34. And they said, The Lord has need of him.

35. And they brought him to Jesus; and throwing their own garments on the colt, they set Jesus on [him].

36. And as He went, they spread their garments in the way.

37. And when He was already near to the descent of the Mount of Olives, all the multitude of the disciples rejoicing began to praise God with a great voice for all the [works of] power that they had seen,

38. Saying, Blessed [be] the King that comes in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven, and glory in the highest!

39. And some of the Pharisees from among the crowd said to Him, Teacher, rebuke Thy disciples.

40. And He answering told them, I say to you, If these should be silent, the stones would cry out.

The story of Zacchaeus is about our readiness to receive divine truth; the parable of the minas is about using that truth in our lives, and the devastation that follows when we deny the Lord and reject the truth. In brief, these two stories contain one of the central messages of the gospels: No one is judging us; we judge ourselves by the free choices that we make. In other words, we can freely choose to joyfully embrace the truth as it comes into our life, as Zacchaeus does, or we can stubbornly reject the truth, as is done by those who say, “we will not have this man reign over us.” ⁹

The idea that someone will “reign over us” is of central significance as we consider the next episode in the series. It is the story of Jesus’ “triumphal entry” into Jerusalem, the fulfillment of ancient prophesy. The idea that the Messiah is coming is creating great excitement among the people. “Could it be Jesus?” they wonder. “Is He the long awaited Messiah who will ‘reign in righteousness’?” (Isaiah 32:1). “Is He the hoped-for king who will ‘reign and prosper and execute judgment in all the earth,’ the one who will ‘save Judah’ and ‘keep Israel safe’?” (Jeremiah 23:5-6). These ancient prophesies are still very much in the minds of the people as they line the streets of Jerusalem, awaiting the beginning of the new kingdom—a new Jerusalem. Many of the people believe that it will occur when Jesus rides into Jerusalem, establishes Himself as their new king, and “executes the judgment” that will lead them to victory over their natural enemies.

This very literal idea—that the kingdom of God will come in a particular place (Jerusalem) at a particular time (when Jesus rides in)—is a misunderstanding of Jesus’ deeper mission. In fact, He has already told His disciples that “the kingdom of God does not come with observation” (17:20). Nevertheless, there is still a great truth contained within the story of the triumphal entry—a truth about how God comes into our lives as the divine truth, and how we can receive that truth, with shouts of triumph, when it comes.

The story of Jesus’ triumphal entry begins with the words, “When He had said this, He went up to Jerusalem” (Luke 19:28). The phrase “up to Jerusalem,” is significant. The temple stood there; it was the place where religion was taught, and rituals were performed. In most people’s minds, therefore, the name “Jerusalem’ was synonymous with religious life, doctrine, faith, and worship. Isaiah calls it “the holy city” (52:1), and Jeremiah calls it “the throne of Jehovah” (3:17). Seen more deeply, the picture of Jesus going “up to Jerusalem” depicts God finding His rightful place at the center of our lives, leading us according to His divine truth. He is, so to speak, “sitting on his throne” within us, ruling our inner lives. This is what happens whenever we choose to “go up” from a literal understanding of scripture and rise to a higher level. ¹⁰

As the people continue to line the streets of Jerusalem, hopes ring high and the questions continue: “Is this the promised return of the Messiah?” “Will Jesus be received as Israel’s true king?” “Will He usher in the long-awaited, much anticipated, kingdom of God?” But before doing anything that might answer these questions, Jesus says to His disciples, “Go into the village and you will find a colt tied on which no one has ever sat. Loose him and bring him here” (Luke 19:30). The disciples obey Jesus. And when they find the colt, they “throw their own garments on the colt, and set Jesus on him” (Luke 19:35).

These details, like the symbolism of going “up to Jerusalem,” are significant. The prophets had foretold that when the Messiah would come into Jerusalem, He would make His entry in just this way. As it is written through the prophet Zechariah, “Rejoice, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold, your king is coming to you; he is just and having salvation, lowly and riding on a colt, the foal of a donkey” (Zechariah 9:9). In keeping with Zechariah’s prophecy, Jesus arranges to enter Jerusalem riding on a colt, the foal of a donkey.

Jesus’ actions were not merely to fulfill scripture, but also to teach deeper lessons about spiritual reality. In Matthew it was stated that Jesus came into Jerusalem riding on both a colt and a she-ass (a female donkey). But in Luke we find that only the colt is mentioned. The detail about a colt upon which no one has ever ridden, represents an understanding that is still pure and open, uncorrupted by false teachings and self-interest. And the absence of the she-ass, which represents natural affections, reminds us once again that Luke focuses our attention on things of the understanding rather than things of the will. Jesus will, therefore, ride into Jerusalem not only on a colt, but upon a colt that no one else has ever ridden.

In sacred scripture, beasts of burden, whether they be donkeys, asses, or colts signify various aspects of the understanding. Because these animals are typically used for carrying burdens, they represent the use of the memory, which carries information. But when used for riding, especially when they carry judges and kings, they represent rationality. In this case, when Jesus is seated upon the colt, it represents the subordination of our rationality to God’s leading. ¹¹

Similarly, the garments which the disciples placed on the colt and spread on the road, also signify aspects of the understanding. In sacred scripture, “garments” signify truth. Just as clothing protects our bodies, truth protects our spirit. While the disciples may not have understood the deeper significance of what they were doing, their actions nevertheless embody eternal truths. ¹²

As Jesus enters Jerusalem riding on a colt, the drama rises to a crescendo. As it is written, “The whole multitude of the disciples began to rejoice and praise God with a loud voice” (Luke 19:37). Quoting from the Hebrew scriptures, they cry out, “Blessed is the King who comes in the name of the Lord” (Psalms 118:26). And they add, “Peace in heaven and glory in the highest” (Luke 19:38). The Pharisees, meanwhile, are outraged at the commotion. The very idea that Jesus is about to be made the new king of Israel, appalls them. So, they call out to Jesus, asking Him to restrain the enthusiasm of His disciples: “Teacher,” they say, “rebuke Your disciples” (Luke 19:39). But Jesus does not. Instead, Jesus says to them, “I tell you that if these should keep silent, the stones would immediately cry out” (Luke 19:40).

Stones, because of their hardness and durability, symbolize the unbreakable nature of truth. It is truth that gives stability and constancy to our character. It is truth that turns us from being a feather in the wind, swayed by conflicting opinions and vacillating between viewpoints, to a person of steadfast conviction. Stones, then, throughout the Word, signify those central, fundamental truths that help us to become unshakeable people of principle. These are the rock-solid truths we have received from the Lord, truths that we will not allow to remain silent. These are the truths that we joyfully proclaim to the extent that we welcome divine truth into our minds and allow it to reign over us. In sacred scripture this is seen as Jesus coming into Jerusalem where He will become king, the ruler of our inner lives. And this is why the “stones,” signifying the truths that we have learned from Him, cannot keep silent. ¹³

Jesus Weeps over Jerusalem

41. And when He was near, seeing the city, He wept over it,

42. Saying, O that thou hadst known, even thou, and indeed, in this thy day, the things [which belong] to thy peace! But now they are hidden from thine eyes.

43. For the days shall come upon thee, and thine enemies shall cast a rampart around thee, and shall surround thee, and shall beset thee on every side;

44. And they shall lay thee level with the ground, and thy children within thee, and they shall not leave in thee stone upon stone; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation.

As Jesus rides into Jerusalem, the people are filled with joy. But Jesus is filled with a very different emotion. The nearer He comes to the city of Jerusalem, the sadder He becomes. As it is written, “As He was near, seeing the city, He wept over it” (Luke 19:41). The cause of His weeping is explained in the next verse where He addresses the people of Jerusalem and says, “If you had known, even you, especially in this your day, the things that make for your peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes” (Luke 19:42). Just moments before, the disciples were under the assumption that they were about to experience “peace in heaven and glory in the highest” (Luke 19:38); but they are thinking of a different kind of peace (victory over natural enemies) and a different kind of glory (being able to rule over other nations).

Aware of their misunderstanding, Jesus weeps and says, “If you had known … the things that make for your peace.” Once again, we are reminded that they could not see or understand the things that truly make for peace. As Jesus put it, “They are hidden from your eyes.” Here again, these references to sight remind us that we are dealing with the understanding. Jesus weeps when he “sees” the city; He says, “If you had ‘known’ these things. And He adds, “But these things are hidden from your ‘eyes.’”

As we have already seen, in sacred scripture, a “house” signifies our individual understanding. It can be a “house of bondage” when it is faulty,” or a “house of the Lord” when it is filled with truth. Similarly, a “city” signifies a complete system of understanding—a belief system that brings together many thoughts, ideas, and beliefs, as in a city filled with houses. If these beliefs are well-organized and true, it is described as “city set on a hill” and as a “holy city.” But when these beliefs are devoid of truth, it is called a “city of emptiness” (Isaiah 24:10) and a “bloody city” (Ezekiel 22:2; Nahum 3:1). Jesus knows that a false belief system can never lead to true peace. It can only lead to states of unrest, anxiety, and misery. ¹⁴

It is no wonder, then, that when Jesus “sees the city” whose inhabitants collectively believe that their happiness consists solely in material prosperity, He weeps, saying, “The things that make for your peace are hidden from your eyes.” Jesus then goes on to make a dire prediction. It is a warning about what can happen to people when they place their trust in earthly success rather than in heavenly blessings. As Jesus puts it, “The days will come upon you when your enemies will build an embankment around you, and surround you, and close you in on every side, and level you, and your children within you, to the ground” (Luke 19:43-44).

This is an accurate historical prophecy; four decades later, Jerusalem was leveled, the temple was destroyed, and many of the inhabitants were killed. Jesus is also speaking about spiritual reality. As long as we believe that happiness consists in the security we find in having material possessions and the glory we experience when conquering others, we are headed for ruin. Our spiritual enemies—anger, revenge, cruelty, resentment, pride, and lust, along with anxiety, fear, discouragement, and despair—will surround us on every side, and will cause us untold suffering. So great will be our distress that we will not know what to believe or be able to understand what is true. As Jesus puts it, “there will not be one stone left upon another” (Luke 19:44).

This is what happens whenever we forget that the kingdom of God is not in space and time; it is within us. It is flowing in at every moment in the form of Divine Love and Divine Wisdom, and is available to us in as great or as small a measure as we are willing to receive. This is the real coming of the Lord. The time is now, and the place is here, but we seldom realize this. That is why this brief episode ends with these words of lament, spoken by Jesus: “You did not know the time of your visitation” (Luke 19:44).

A practical application

This episode concludes with the lament, “You did not know the time of your visitation.” In sacred scripture, “visitation” refers to the coming of divine truth into our life. If we are open to the reception of divine truth because we have a good heart and want to become the best people we can be, this “time of visitation” will be a welcome one. But if we are inclined to go our own way, and do our own thing, without regard for divine truth, the Lord’s “visitation” will be seen as a threat and as a condemnation. What is your state of reception when a new truth comes to you, perhaps even in the form of a criticism? Do you see it as a judgment that condemns you, or as a light that can reveal your blind spots and lead you out of darkness? With this in mind, be on the lookout for new truth as it comes into your life, especially through the inner meaning of the Word. Receive it as Zacchaeus did, as a royal visit from the King of Kings.

Jesus Visits the Temple

45. And He came into the temple, and began to cast out those that sold therein, and those that bought,

46. Saying to them, It is written, My house is a house of prayer, but you have made it a cave of robbers.

47. And He taught daily in the temple. But the chief priests and the scribes and the first of the people sought to destroy Him,

48. And could not find what they might do, for all the people hung upon Him to hear [Him].

Visitation is not necessarily a joyous event. When we are “visited” by a new truth, it can be disconcerting. In fact, once we realize our enslavement to our old habits and false ideas, it may cause a major upheaval in our lives. This is pictured in the next episode as Jesus enters the temple in Jerusalem: “Then He went into the temple and began to cast out those who bought and sold in it” (Luke 19:45). ¹⁵

On the literal level, this scene occurs at the temple in Jerusalem where rampant commercialism has made a parody of true worship. The problem is nothing new. Jesus quotes from the prophet Jeremiah who lived centuries before, saying, “It is written, ‘My house is a house of prayer,’ but you have made it ‘a den of thieves’” (Luke 19:46).

On a deeper level, “the temple at Jerusalem” is our own mind. While it should be a “house of prayer,” it can also be a “den of thieves.” These thieves are the false thoughts that invade our minds, robbing us of the truth and filling us with lies. Therefore, when Jesus comes into the temple of our minds as new truth—a new understanding of how to love God and serve others—a combat ensues. The thieves and robbers within us, hating to be discovered and dethroned, fight back, for they are unwilling to surrender their ground. If we realize, however, that this is “the time of our visitation,” we will understand that the Lord is coming into our lives to cast out falsity so that we can receive instruction from Him. As it is written, “He was teaching daily in the temple” (Luke 19:47). ¹⁶

Paying heed to the many ways the Lord is leading and teaching us from moment to moment is vital to spiritual growth, and especially crucial during times of spiritual combat. On the one hand “the chief priests, the scribes, and the leaders of the people sought to destroy Him” (Luke 19:47). That is, there are parts of ourselves that are not ready or willing to receive instruction. But if we stay focused on what Jesus is teaching us, we will be kept safe. In this regard we read that the priests, scribes, and leaders “were unable to do anything; for all the people were very attentive to hear Him” (Luke 19:48).

A practical application

When the Lord comes into the temple, He casts out those who are buying and selling in what should have been a “house of prayer.” Once we identify the falsities that arise from the self-interested “buyers and sellers” in our own minds, the Lord can help us cast them out. Only then can we begin to focus on what we need to learn from Him. As long as we do this, “being very attentive” to the Lord’s words, the negative tendencies of our lower nature will have no power over us. We will be free to focus our attention on becoming the kind of person the Lord is teaching us to be. As it written through the prophet Isaiah, “Cease to do evil; learn to do good” (Isaiah 1:16-17). ¹⁷

Footnotes:

778. And upon his heads a name of blasphemy, signifies the falsifications of the Word. This is evident from the signification of "heads," as being the knowledge of the holy things of the Word, which are falsified and adulterated (See above, n. 775); also from the signification of "name," as being the quality of a thing and its state (See above, n. 102, 135, 696); here the quality of the reasonings from the natural man confirming the separation of faith from life, which are signified by this "beast;" also from the signification of "blasphemy," as being the falsification of the Word (of which presently). From this it is evident that "upon his heads a name of blasphemy" signifies the quality of those who by reasonings from the natural man confirm the separation of faith from life, and that the quality of such is the falsification of the Word. "Blasphemy" signifies the falsification of the Word, because in what follows by this beast is described the way in which those who are meant by the dragon pervert the sense of the letter of the Word by reasonings from the natural man, that they may confirm the justification and salvation by faith alone without good works; and this cannot be done except by their falsifying the Word, which in each and every particular conjoins truths to goods and goods to truths, thus faith to charity and charity to faith (as shown above, n. 775. This is why falsifications of the Word are signified by "blasphemy," which is said to be the name of this beast.

[2] But how the Word is blasphemed by the falsification of it shall be illustrated by the following example. Those who separate faith from good works say:

That God the Father removed and even rejected from Himself the human race on account of their evils; and for this reason His Son was sent into the world, or the Son Himself, moved by pity, came into the world, and by the punishment of extreme condemnation, which was the passion of the cross, and by His own blood upon it, and finally by His death, He reconciled mankind to the Father, by thus interceding for it.

As this is among the chief things of the doctrine of those who separate faith from its life, which is charity, I will state briefly how the Divine is thereby blasphemed. It is blasphemed by this, that they believe and think that the Divine removed or rejected the human race from itself, when yet God is love itself, mercy itself, and goodness itself, and these are His Esse; evidently, therefore, it is impossible for God to remove or reject a single one of the human race, for this would be to act against His own Esse, which, as has been said, is the source of all love, all mercy, and all good. It would be impossible even for any angel or any man who is in love, mercy, and good from the Lord, to do this; and yet their love is finite, while the Divine love is infinite. God the Father's removing or rejecting the human race they call vindictive justice, of which they cherish no other idea than that of a king or judge avenging an evil done to him, consequently that it is like their vengeance, in which there cannot but be something of anger. To confirm this they cite passages from the Word where God is called an avenger, a revenger, jealous, angry, wrathful; and these passages of the Word they thus falsify, since these expressions are used in the sense of the letter of the Word according to appearances. For when a man after death becomes a spirit, if he is in evils from his life in the world he turns himself away from the Lord; and when he turns himself away from the Lord and denies Him he can no longer be so under the Lord's protection that his evil does not punish him, for the punishment of evil is in the evil, as the reward of good is in the good. But because the punishment of evil by the evil, or by those who are evil, appears as if it were punishment by the Divine, so from that appearance the Divine is said in the Word to be angry, to condemn, to cast into hell, and the like. Yet the Lord condemns and punishes no one (as can be seen in the work on Heaven and Hell 545-550, under the head, The Lord casts no one down into Hell, but the spirit casts himself down). From this can be seen how the Divine is blasphemed by the falsification of the Word. For it is thought that God is in some respect an avenger, or revenger, that He is angry, that He casts into hell and punishes, when in fact it is evil that punishes itself, that is, hell from which evil is, and not the Divine. The Divine is blasphemed by the falsification of the Word also by their believing and thinking that God the Father wished to be reconciled to the human race by the punishment of extreme condemnation, which was the passion of the cross, thus by the blood of His Son; and that by this He was moved and is moved to mercy. Who that has an enlightened understanding does not see that this, too, is contrary to the Divine, and therefore contrary to the genuine truth of the Word? For as what is contrary to the Divine is blasphemy, so to wrest the sense of the letter of the Word to confirm this doctrine is blasphemy. But more about this in what follows.

[3] What, then, is signified by "blasphemy" can be seen from passages in the Word where it is mentioned; from which I am only allowed to cite the following. In the Gospels:

Jesus said, Every sin and blasphemy shall be remitted unto men, but the blasphemy of the Spirit shall not be remitted unto men. And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man it shall be remitted unto him, but whosoever shall speak against the Holy Spirit it shall not be remitted unto him, neither in this age nor in that which is to come (Matthew 12:31, 32).

I say unto you, All sins shall be remitted unto the sons of man. But whosoever shall blaspheme against the Spirit hath no remission to eternity, but shall be subject to an eternal judgment (Mark 3:28, 29).

Everyone who shall speak a word against the Son of man it shall be remitted unto him, but unto him that blasphemeth the Holy Spirit it shall not be remitted (Luke 12:10).

What is signified by "sin and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit," and what by "a word against the Son of man," has not hitherto been known in the church, and for the reason that it has not been known what is properly meant by "the Holy Spirit," and what by "the Son of man." "The Holy Spirit" means the Lord in relation to Divine truth such as it is in the heavens, that is, the Word such as it is in the spiritual sense, for this is Divine truth in heaven. And "the Son of man" means Divine truth such as it is on the earth, that is, the Word such as it is in the natural sense, for this is Divine truth on the earth. When it is known what is meant by "the Holy Spirit," and what by "the Son of man," it can also be known what is signified by "sin and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit," and by "a word against the Son of man;" also why "a word against the Son of man" can be remitted, and "sin and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit" cannot. "Sin and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit" means to deny the Word, and to adulterate its essential goods and falsify its essential truths; while "a word against the Son of man" means to interpret the natural sense of the Word, which is the sense of its letter, according to appearances.

[4] To deny the Word is a sin that "cannot be remitted in this age nor in that which is to come," that is, to eternity, and he who does it "is subject to an eternal judgment," because those who deny the Word deny God, deny the Lord, deny heaven and hell, and deny the church and all things pertaining to it; and those who deny these are atheists, who, although with their lips they attribute the creation of the universe to some Supreme Entity, or Deity, or God, yet in heart ascribe it to nature. Because such by denial have dissolved all bond of connection with the Lord they must needs be separated from heaven and conjoined to hell. To adulterate the essential goods of the Word and to falsify its essential truths is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit that cannot be remitted, because "the Holy Spirit" means the Lord in relation to Divine truth such as it is in the heavens, that is, the Word such as it is in the spiritual sense, as has been said above. In the spiritual sense are genuine goods and genuine truths; but in the natural sense these same are as it were clothed, and only here and there are naked. They are therefore called apparent goods and truths. These are what are adulterated and falsified; and they are said to be adulterated and falsified when they are so explained as to be contrary to genuine goods and truths, for heaven then removes itself and man is separated from it; and for the reason, as has been said, that genuine goods and truths constitute the spiritual sense of the Word in which the angels of heaven are. For example, heaven is removed from man when the Lord and His Divine are denied, as was done by the Pharisees who said that the Lord wrought miracles by Beelzebub and had an unclean spirit; and because they thus denied Him and His Divine He said that this was sin and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, because it was against the Word, as may be seen in the preceding verses of these chapters in the Gospels. For the same reason also the Socinians and Arians, who deny the Divine of the Lord, although they do not deny the Lord, are out of heaven, and cannot be received by any angelic society.

[5] Take, as another example, those who exclude the goods of love and the works of charity from among the means of salvation, and who claim that faith, exclusive of these, is the sole means of salvation, and who confirm this opinion not only by doctrine but also by their life, saying in heart, Goods do not save me nor evils condemn, because I have faith. Such also blaspheme the Holy Spirit, for they falsify the genuine good and truth of the Word, and this in a thousand passages, where love and charity and deeds and works are mentioned. Moreover, as has been said above, in each and every thing of the Word there is the marriage of good and truth, thus of charity and faith; consequently when good or charity is taken away that marriage perishes, and instead there is adultery; the nature of this adultery will be explained elsewhere. This is why these, too, cannot be received into heaven; and for the further reason that they have put earthly love in place of heavenly love and evil works in place of good works, because their works are from earthly love, and when this is separated from heavenly love it is infernal love. But it is otherwise with those who believe, indeed, from the doctrine of the church and from their teachers, that faith is the only means of salvation, or who know this, but inwardly neither affirm it nor deny it, and who, nevertheless, live a good life from the Word, that is, because the Lord has so commanded in the Word. Such do not blaspheme the Holy Spirit, for they do not adulterate the goods of the Word nor falsify its truths, wherefore they have conjunction with the angels of heaven. Moreover, few of such know that faith is anything else than believing in the Word. The dogma of justification by faith alone without the works of the law they do not apprehend, because it transcends their understanding.

[6] These two examples are cited to make known what is meant by "sin and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit," that is, that sin against it is to deny the Divine truth, thus the Word, and that blasphemy against it is to adulterate the essential goods of the Word and falsify its essential truths. Let it be noted that the good of the Word when adulterated is evil, and that its truth when falsified is falsity. A word against the Son of man, signifies to interpret the natural sense of the Word, which is the sense of its letter, according to appearances, because the Son of man means the Lord in relation to Divine truth such as it is on earth, thus such as it is in the natural sense. Such a word is remitted unto men, because most things in the natural sense of the Word, or the sense of its letter, are goods and truths clothed, and some only are naked, as they are in the spiritual sense; and goods and truths that are clothed are called appearances of truth. For the Word in its ultimates is like a man clothed with a garment, but with his face and hands naked; and where the Word is thus naked its goods and truths appear naked, as they do in heaven, thus such as they are in the spiritual sense. There is, therefore, nothing to hinder those who are enlightened by the Lord from seeing, or to hinder those who are not so enlightened from confirming, the doctrine of genuine good and genuine truth from the sense of the letter of the Word. The Word is such in the sense of the letter that it may be a basis for the spiritual sense; thus, too, it is accommodated to the comprehension of the simple, who, unless things are so stated, are unable to perceive them, and when perceived, to believe and do them.

[7] Moreover, because the Divine truths in the sense of the letter of the Word are for the most part appearances of truth, and the simple in faith and heart cannot be raised above them, it is not sin or blasphemy to interpret the Word according to appearances, provided principles are not formed from these appearances and so confirmed as to destroy Divine truth in its genuine sense. For example, where it is said:

Behold the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world (John 1:29);

and:

This is My blood, that of the new Testament, which is poured out for many for the remission of sins (Matthew 26:28);

and again:

Michael and his angels fought against the dragon and his angels. And they overcame him through the blood of the Lamb (Revelation 12:7, 11);

and when from these words it is believed in simplicity that the Lord suffered the passion of the cross on account of our sins, and that through this suffering and His blood He redeemed us from hell-since this is an apparent truth, and can be stated and believed, therefore it does not condemn the simple in faith and heart. But to establish a principle from these words, and to confirm that principle so far as to hold that God the Father was and is in this way reconciled to man, and that man is justified and saved by his faith alone without the good things of charity, which are good works, and to be in that principle in life as well as in doctrine-this cannot be remitted.

[8] From this it can be seen that "blasphemy against the Holy Spirit" signifies the falsification of the Word even to the destruction of Divine truth in its genuine sense. Therefore "a name of blasphemy" signifies the falsification of Divine truth, thus of the Word, because it is called blasphemy when anyone speaks against God; and to speak against God is to speak against the Divine truth, for the Divine truth proceeding from the Lord is what is meant in the Word by "God;" and Divine good is meant by "Jehovah," and by "the Lord." And as it is blasphemy to speak against God, thus also against the Word, since the Word is Divine truth, it follows that blasphemy is to falsify the Word. For those who falsify the Word make its truth to be falsity, and falsity continually speaks against truth, and even assaults it. This is why "blasphemy" signifies the falsification of the Word, even to the destruction of its genuine good and genuine truth.

[9] The like is said of the "scarlet beast" further on in Revelation:

The woman sitting upon the scarlet beast was full of the names of blasphemy (Revelation 17:3).

That beast with the woman sitting on it there means Babylon; and "the names of blasphemy" mean the adulterations of the good and the falsifications of the truth of the Word; and these, as has been said, are blasphemies against the Lord.

[10] That "blasphemies" signify to believe and speak wickedly and falsely about God and about Divine truth can also be seen from other passages in the Word. As in Isaiah:

Jehovah said, Fear not on account of the words which thou hast heard, wherewith the young men of the king of Assyria have blasphemed Me. And Hezekiah the king prayed, and said, Hear, O Jehovah, all the words of Sennacherib, who hath sent to blaspheme the living God. And Jehovah spake concerning him, Whom hast thou blasphemed and reviled, and against whom hast thou exalted thy voice and lifted up thine eyes on high? Against the Holy One of Israel! By the hand of thy servants thou hast blasphemed the Lord (Isaiah 37:6, 15, 17, 23, 24).

From this, too, it can be seen that blasphemy is predicated of false speaking against God. For "the king of Assyria," who at that time was Sennacherib, signifies the rational, but here the rational perverted, which speaks against Divine truth, treats it shamefully, and censures it by falsities; and this is to falsify it, as has been said above. The falsities spoken against Divine truth are signified by the things mentioned in verses 10-13, 24, 25, which were all not only blasphemies against God but also falsifications of Divine truth.

[11] In Moses:

As to the soul that doeth with a high hand, the same blasphemeth Jehovah, in that he hath despised the word of Jehovah and hath rendered void His commandment, that soul shall be utterly cut off, its iniquity shall be upon it (Numbers 15:30, 31).

This treats of those who act against the commandments of God given through Moses, both through error, and also from purpose (as is clear from verse 23 and those that follow in that chapter); here those who so act from purpose are treated of, and this is meant by "doing with a high hand." And since to act against a commandment is to act against Divine truth, and to act against this from purpose is to act from the intention of the will, and from that to speak falsity, which is the actual adulteration and falsification of the Word, therefore it is said "he blasphemeth Jehovah." And as this is similar to the sin and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit it is said, "that soul shall be utterly cut off, its iniquity shall be upon it;" "its iniquity shall be upon it" signifying that it cannot be remitted.

[12] That blasphemy is predicated of evil speaking and false speaking about God, and thus about Divine truth, it is unnecessary to confirm here by many passages from the Word; not only because anyone can see that blasphemy is nothing else in the spiritual sense, but also because there are various kinds of it; consequently in human languages, as in the Hebrew, there are various terms by which the kinds of blasphemy of God and of the Divine truth are expressed, such as calumny, contumely, ignominy, opprobrium, reproach, rebuke, jesting, scoffing, mocking, and others, each of which is used in the Word with a generic and specific difference, to analyze and explain which would require many pages.